Search for: "Reed v. Reed" Results 421 - 440 of 3,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
On Monday and Tuesday, the 3 and 4 December 2018, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, and Lord Lloyd-Jones) will hear Privacy International’s appeal (UKSC 2018/0004) against the Court of Appeal’s decision in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2017] EWCA Civ 1868; [2018] 1 WLR 2572), which found that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA 2000”), s 67(8)… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 12:05 am
The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has now released its opinion in John Doe #1 v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:52 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Here's a LINK to an excellent post from the Drug and Device Law Blog by Attorney James Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm on the just handed down Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion in the case of Betz v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:13 am by Charles Sartain
Real author Paul Yale You’re in for a treat today; a report from my Gray Reed partner Paul Yale on the Texas Supreme Court decision, Yowell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Nicholas Malfitano, Penn Record/Forbes, earlier on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Tuesday 13 March 2012 is the one day hearing of NJDB v JEG and anor, on appeal from the Court of Session (Scotland) and to be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Clarke, Wilson and Reed. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:46 am by Alexandra Allan
In January changes to the way in which Cargo residues were classified came into effect by way of changes to MARPOL Annex V (see our client alert of 8 March 2013; Revised MARPOL Annex V: Just Who Should Take Out the Trash?). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:50 am by Laura Sandwell
The Easter Term 2012 starts on Tuesday 17 April, and the first listing is Fairclough Homes Ltd v Summers, due to be heard from 18 – 19 April 2012 by Lords Hope, Kerr, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:56 am by Alexandra Allan
As was said in CTN Cash and Carry Ltd v Gallaher Ltd [1994] 4 All E.R. 714, judges are prepared to be the arbiters of social evaluation: that is, apply a standard of impropriety rather than technical unlawfulness. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:13 pm by Lisa Baird
Over on the Drug & Device Law blog, Reed Smith partner Jim Beck applauds the recent decision in Tyree v. [read post]