Search for: "Reed v. Rule"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 11:25 am
For more details regarding this decision, read the Reed Smith Client Alert or contact Cynthia O’Donoghue, Daniel Kadar, Kate Brimsted, Dr. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
So here, too, the interpretive rules I champion do not invariably “happen[] to agree with everything Akhil Reed Amar believes is right and good. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 5:44 am
Robert Half Int’l Inc. and the Sixth Circuit’s decision last year in Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Giving the lead judgment Lord Reed stated that the decisions taken to authorise the segregation under the Prison Rules 1999, rule 45(2), was not taken by the Secretary of State but instead by a senior prison officer. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog only. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 8:10 am
Reed D. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:31 am
LEXIS 48082, Jan. 27, 2017), denied preliminary relief to a Christian inmate who objected on religious grounds to rules that prevent him from hanging a privacy sheet in his cell.In Sterling v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am
In part so as not to repudiate big chunks of Tam/Brunetti, the Court instead delivers a major rebuke to Reed v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:13 am
Lord Kerr gave the dissenting judgment, with which Lord Reed agreed: they would both have allowed the appeal. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
(Schofield v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
Or consider Reed v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:13 am
It began by rejecting Reed’s argument that the district court judge’s ruling “essentially withdrew evidence, . . . [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 10:18 am
Reed, Esq., for contributing this entry) [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:22 pm
First, Bexis wishes to welcome the Blog's readership from his new office at Reed Smith. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm
[This shadow docket ruling, combined with Biden v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:43 am
In the dissenting judgment, Lords Reed and Mance took the view that the language of the provisions cannot be interpreted as excluding offences which the prosecution had elected to leave out of account for the purpose of assessing the benefit obtained by the defendant. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
See Daar v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
In two separate recent Pennsylvania Federal Court decisions, courts have ruled that Pennsylvania law does not allow for strict liability claims against prescription medical products, including medical devices.In Cogswell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Lucy F Reed & James Freda, Maxwell Lecture: After ICCA Singapore, After ICCA Miami: The Next QuestionsCase CommentsCharles T Kotuby, Jr & James Egerton-Vernon, Apotex Inc v The Government of the United States of America: Will Barriers to Jurisdiction Inhibit an Emerging Trend? [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:38 pm
I send thanks to Attorney James Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this Scott v. [read post]
