Search for: "Rhodes v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 1,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2018, 9:41 am by Ilya Somin
While Judge Ramos' ruling breaks little new ground, it is significant because it applies to a case brought by seven states (New Jersey, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Washington state and Virginia), and New York City. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:19 am by Edward T. Kang
Other states that take a hostile view towards non-competes are Nevada, Rhode Island, North Dakota and Oklahoma. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
Rhode Island Governor Gina Raimondo (D) and Speaker Nicholas Mattiello (D) for championing reforms which make the state less of an outlier in state taxation. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am by Adam Feldman
Some of the clearly more liberal policies like that in Rhode Island use a 24-week marker as the deadline. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  The dreaded Rhode Island veto, relied on by the hapless leaders of that state when they refused to send any delegates at all to Philadelphia, was no more. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The statute lays down that a duty of care is owed to visitors in respect of dangers due to the state of the premises or to things done or omitted to be done on them. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:47 am by Graham Smith
The statute lays down that a duty of care is owed to visitors in respect of dangers due to the state of the premises or to things done or omitted to be done on them. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
After Parker v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
The right to participate in political boycotts was clearly established by the Supreme Court in NAACP v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am by Joyce Kung
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm by David Super
       By contrast, if a convention follows the ratification process under Article V, any change would require approval of thirty-eight state legislatures or state conventions. [read post]