Search for: "Robert Duck" Results 421 - 440 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2009, 9:25 am
A few days ago, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said president Obama will soon announce a new F.D.A. commissioner. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Standing doctrine in general is somewhat indeterminate, and courts have been known to find standing when they want to reach the merits while finding no standing when they want to duck the merits. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:10 am by Kinney Recruiting
[Ed. note: This post is authored by Evan Jowers and Robert Kinney of Kinney Recruiting, sponsor of the Asia Chronicles. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:02 am
Glenn Reynolds links to a column by Slate wine critic Mike Steinberger on what wine to drink at Thanksgiving. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
Robert Welch, Inc. recognized private individuals are more vulnerable to injury than public officials, especially considering public officials have larger channels of communication than private individuals, the Court recognized that many private individuals attract attention and comment.[13] Following the Supreme Court's lead, a number of other courts have recognized restaurants as public figures.[14] Thus, a restaurant bringing a defamation suit against a critic would have to prove… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm by Jeff Gamso
., Inc. last year.After talking about Gardner, and Geoffrey Feiger and Andy Jackson and Chief Justice John Marshall, I got around to, well, let me just copy in a bit of what I wrote then.And so it came to pass that Antonin Scalia went duck hunting with Dick Cheney. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He still works his farm and his Dover chambers display the ducks on the losing side of his shooting excursions. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm by Steven Calabresi
Meanwhile, the law would immediately remake the voting membership of the Supreme Court from a 6 to 3 moderate, libertarian, and conservative Republican-appointed majority, into a Supreme Court with a 6 to 3 Progressive Democratic-appointed majority, and three Republican-appointed members without a vote on cases before the Supreme Court: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by cap95
We posted a pdf file of Cheryl Cheatham's "timeline" of ethics developments and rule-making in Congress. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Victor Medina
I’m so glad that you could join us here this Saturday morning for a rip‑rousing, another episode of Make It Last where we help you keep your legal ducks in a row, and your financial nest egg secure. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Blawg Review #304—The "Spooked by Nukes" Edition ~~~  "A nuclear era, but I have no fear.... [read post]
Senate during the lame-duck period prior to January is worse for Republicans than a 50-50 tie given that Covid still might affect important votes), but it also might generate some legal questions under Nebraska law. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:10 am
A statement made a few days ago by White House press secretary Robert Gibbs might change that legal thorn in the side of food safety. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Roger Pilon
That’s a political question, of course, which the Court answered, implicitly, by ducking the issue, which Bickel defended. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
Robert Welch, Inc. (1974), private-figure plaintiffs—as plaintiffs here are likely to be—only have to show negligence to recover proven compensatory damages (including identifiable business losses as well as emotional distress damages). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am by Michael Klarman
Most commentators agreed that the dissent had the better of the standing argument, which suggests that the Justices in the majority had decided to “duck” the question of whether state bans on gay marriage were constitutional. [read post]
In middle of the sketch, Chief Justice Roberts hovers over the Supreme Court building with raised arms, uttering the words: “These two things are Not the same…for reasons too sublime for mere mortals to grasp. [read post]