Search for: "Robert v. Department of Insurance" Results 421 - 440 of 697
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2013, 4:37 am by David DePaolo
The Appellate Division's 3rd Department rejected Kigin's challenge to the board's pre-authorization scheme, arguing that the board had exceeded the Legislature's grant of authority in enacting the regulations, and that the regulations were in conflict with their enabling legislation. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week's summaries concern: Disability insurance / Expungement of trade mark / Retroactive maintenance order / Real property boundary / Requirement of leave to appeal: Jackson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
(All federal workers’ compensation claims are managed by the Department of Labor.) [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm by Law Lady
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT and DOWN HOME MEDICAL, Appellees. 1st District.Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- Appeals -- Jurisdiction -- Trial court was without jurisdiction to vacate modification order while an appeal of that very order was pending? [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm by Law Lady
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT and DOWN HOME MEDICAL, Appellees. 1st District.Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- Appeals -- Jurisdiction -- Trial court was without jurisdiction to vacate modification order while an appeal of that very order was pending
LOY CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 2:43 pm
Little noticed, among the various orders it issued at the outset, was a request in Case No. 11-438 (see p. 7 of the order list) that the Department of Justice -- that is, the Solicitor General -- respond to a petition for rehearing filed over the summer in a case which the Court had declined to review on June 29, 2012 -- the day after it issued its controversial decision in National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Finally, In an August 21, 2012 opinion, Central District of California Judge James V. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:32 am by Ilya Somin
A tax on not doing something — here, not buying insurance — is best classified as a fancy variation on a head tax — a direct tax. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
" HRA Commissioner Robert Doar said, "This case is an egregious example of individuals preying on our most vulnerable population. [read post]