Search for: "Rock v. Marks"
Results 421 - 440
of 746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 am
Coty Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:58 am
Tam (formerly Lee v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:34 am
The Ninth Circuit faced this issue in the case titled: Metal Jeans, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Not so with today’s case, Truitt v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
Little Rock L. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In Toyukak v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:57 pm
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
Weil V. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Macro: it is more attractive on the whole even if I’m not going to purchase disparagingly marked products. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
We’ll exclude purely entertainment media (see our rock 'n roll post for some of that) and stick to cases where somebody alleged detrimental reliance of some sort on published information ( [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Lantagne (Univ. of Mississippi School of Law) Mark A. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
: Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer (World Trademark Review) (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) Copyright protection should apply to functions of computer programs, software company claims in ECJ case: SAS v World Programming (Out-Law) How do you solve a problem like Orphan Works? [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
Registration constitutes "prima facie evidence of the validity of the registered mark . . . , of the registrant's ownership of the mark, and of the registrant's exclusive right to use the registered mark . .. . [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
(CSI) v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
” Hard Rock Café Int’l United States Inc., v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
In Lee v. [read post]
