Search for: "Rodger "Doe" Results 421 - 440 of 441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2008, 11:04 am
 Obtaining production rights from a publisher (such as Samuel French, Tams-Witmark, Rodgers & Hammerstein, etc.), does NOT include the right to copy all or part of the broadway, off-broadway or other original production. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
And does the Act seem to constitute an unconstitutional bill of attainder? [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 5:03 pm
  Is it sufficient that the fraudulent claims were paid with government money, or does it require a showing that the false claims were actually presented to the federal government? [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Concluding the Contract does not proscribe the relief sought by State Group, we remand with instructions that the trial court determine whether and to what extent damages under this statute are warranted. * * * Recovery under the Crime Victims Statute is not based on a breach of contract, but must be predicated on an independent tort. * * * The indemnification clause in this case lacks the requisite specificity, as it in no way refers to criminal or fraudulent conduct on the part of… [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:34 am
Attorney Bernstein admits Wilson's punishment did not fit the crime and clearly stated she does not condone any form of sexual misconduct by anyone. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 8:25 am
I first learned of this technique from Judy Rodgers' Zuni Café Cookbook. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Code § 19-1-29.5-13, does not specifically limit the mayor's power to appoint a chief of police. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 9:10 pm
 Praised be dissenting Judge Judith Rodgers for having none of the Booker majority's Fourth Amendment-violating charade. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:51 am
Newman, Jerry Pollock, Edward Rodgers, and C. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 11:07 am
* Rodger Citron (Moderator), Assistant Professor of Law, Touro Law Center. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:56 pm
The Fourth Circuit Court ruled in late October that, under the usual rule that possession is a strong indicator of ownership where formal title does not exist, the papers belong to Willcox. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:13 pm
The reference in the link is to the cover of the original pleadings [back] For the family history of Mrs Donoghue and other interesting points about the case, see AF Rodger, "Mrs Donoghue and Alfenus Varus" (1988) 41 Current Legal Problems 1 and W. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
It does not go to substantive law; it does not contradict a prohibition contained in a jus cogens norm but merely diverts any breach of it to a different method of settlement. [read post]
16 Jan 2006, 7:42 am
Pa. 12/16/05); In re Rodgers, __ B.R. __, 2005 WL 3454702 (Bankr. [read post]