Search for: "Rome v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2021, 1:07 am
In line with the above-stated quotation, they suggest a radical reorientation of choice-of-law rules. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am
Hodges to that of Texas v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 4:08 pm
Kohen, La création de l'Etat d'Israël à la lumière du droit internacionalHelmut Tichy & Ulrike Köhler, Legal Personality or not - The Recent Attempts to Improve the Status of the OSCEChristian Tomuschat, In the Twilight Zones of the StateTullio Treves, Some Peculiarities of the UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The federal court — indicating that respondent may have violated added requirements to report expenses in excess of $100, to limit hiring at his law firm and restrict support staff to two full-time staff members — referred the matter for prosecution by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988747 [SD NY 2006]). [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Charter declares), which too often produces “unimaginable atrocities that deeply shock the conscience of humanity” (as the preamble to the Rome Statute laments). [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am
Alphabet https://t.co/DwhCwysLC2 2020-03-17 Another Troubling Courtroom Loss for Online Marketplaces–Massachusetts Port Authority v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am
Alphabet https://t.co/DwhCwysLC2 2020-03-17 Another Troubling Courtroom Loss for Online Marketplaces–Massachusetts Port Authority v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
” On July 17, State representatives and civil society organizations meeting in New York on the 25th anniversary of the Rome Statute discussed the latter point: which jurisdiction will actually hold aggression trials of the Russian leadership? [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:22 am
Written by Yannick Morath Yannick Morath, doctoral candidate at the University of Freiburg, has kindly provided us with his thoughts on the CJEU’s judgement in the case of LG and Others v Rina SpA, Ente Registro Italiano Navale (C-641/18 – ECLI:EU:C:2020:349) (See also the earlier post by Matthias Weller concerning the CJEU’s judgement). [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
The UK has wisely carried forward the rules of applicable law contained in the Rome Regulations. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:39 am
, A/HRC/39/46, para. 143; Yrusta v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:55 am
We have already alerted our readers to the preliminary reference triggered by the Estonian Supreme Court concerning violations of personality rights of legal persons committed via the internet (Bolagsupplysningen OÜ, Ingrid Ilsjan v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:50 pm
In its recent judgment in Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez v MGN Ltd (25 October 2011), the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union has laid down a radical new rule of jurisdiction over torts committed online, giving claimants the choice of suing in their home courts. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 1:38 am
The ELI project builds on the idea that the Convention, which is currently in force for twelve States (ten of which are also Member States of the Union), generally provides appropriate answers to the issues raised by the protection of adults in situations with a foreign element. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:02 pm
The first case of COVID-19 in Italy appeared in late January, when Chinese tourists from Wuhan were hospitalized in Rome after passing through Milan. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
Jahrhunderts v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:01 pm
In its June 20, 2023, decision in Paulson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Yet, in Sosa v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
My family and I lived in DC, Chicago, Grand Rapids, Detroit and Chicago again first--but for us all along this was the Promised Land, a true City-State in southern Ohio which was always compared to Rome due to the climate and the hills, seven of them in particular. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 6:36 pm
Last summer, the California Labor Commission ruled in Uber v Berwick that Uber workers in that state were employees, not contractors, based on the broad basis of control exerted by the company. [read post]
