Search for: "Rules for Court Reporters" Results 421 - 440 of 91,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2011, 11:10 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Wednesday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Harrington v. [read post]
5 May 2003, 11:20 am
The Court also handed down a brief per curiam ruling in Kaupp v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  We most prominently saw this outcome when Judge Pitman ruled that Baylor University waived the The post No Privilege for University of Iowa’s Internal Investigation, Court Rules appeared first on Presnell on Privileges. [read post]
28 Jan 2006, 11:59 am
[JURIST] In the first ruling of its kind, the British High Court on Friday ruled that two British citizens accused of illegal file-sharing must pay damages for violating UK copyright laws. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:06 am
The decision facilitates the restitution process [Dziennik Gazeta report, in Polish] for those harmed while martial law remained in effect by eliminating the need for courts to rule on the declaration's constitutionality on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:02 am
[JURIST] The Kuwaiti Constitutional Court [official website, in Arabic] ruled Wednesday that female lawmakers are not required to wear the hijab [JURIST news archive], or traditional Muslim headscarf. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:36 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 8-1 in Milner v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
  We most prominently saw this outcome when Judge Pitman ruled that Baylor University waived the The post No Privilege for University of Iowa’s Internal Investigation, Court Rules appeared first on Presnell on Privileges. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm by Taylor Gillan
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Wednesday that time limits under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) [28 USC § 2401(b)] are subject to equitable tolling. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 7:06 pm
[JURIST] The Bangladesh Supreme Court [official website] ruled on Thursday that the extortion trial of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina [party profile; JURIST news archive] could continue, rejecting arguments by Hasina's lawyers that she could not be tried under the current state of emergency rules because the alleged crimes occurred before the national state of emergency [JURIST report] was [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:58 am by Julia Zebley
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled 8-1 [opinion, PDF] Monday in MBZ v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:44 am by Sarah Posner
Judge Richard Arnold ruled that the operators of The Pirate Bay planned to infringe the copyright [Bloomberg report] of Sony and other recording labels and led the users of their website to do the same. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:31 am by Lauren Laing
In February an Australian judge ruled [JURIST report] that the nation's ban on same-sex marriage does not... [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:40 pm
On appeal, the California Court of Appeal ultimately ruled for CBS and ordered the trial court to dismiss Young's lawsuit. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:37 pm
As set  out in the Report, "[t]he purpose of the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s rule reform initiative is to simplify the rules, make appeal proceedings more affordable and address anomalies in the existing Court of Appeal Act and Rules. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:40 am by NJLLA
Back in 2009-10, at the recommendation of NJLLA, the Judiciary web site added a single index page leading to the biannual and annual pages that provide links to the reports of the various Supreme Court Rules Committees. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:27 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit [official website] will reexamine a previous ruling [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that upheld three of the rules but rejected a fourth after all four were [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 12:35 pm by Rachel Grunberger
  Specifically, it applies to a covered entity that is also: A State agency; An entity designated by the State to report, or collect information for reporting, on behalf of the State to the NICS; or A court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that makes the commitment or adjudication that causes a person to be subject to the mental health prohibitor. [read post]