Search for: "Russell, Appeal of"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2019, 7:46 pm
Supreme Court snubs University of Wisconsin appeal in patent fight with Apple (Source: Reuters) Stephanie Russell-Kraft: Akin Gump Grows IP Team with Two Washington Patent Lawyers (1) (Source: Bloomberg Law) Stephen Mayhew: Chutian Dragon Licenses Idex On-Card Biometric Enrollment Intellectual Property (Source: Biometric) Mihir Maddireddy: Ford Patent Sheds Light on 2021 Bronco’s Removable Doors (Source: Car and Driver) Source: USPTO Commentary and Journal… [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
In this empirical study, I consider the entire run of streetcar injuries, claims, trial-court suits, and appeals. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
” At Slate (via How Appealing), Adriel I. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 1:53 pm
Proposed amendments to the Maryland Rules would allow the Court of Appeals to place judges on administrative leave or even suspend them without pay during disciplinary proceedings, changes prompted by the situation in Baltimore involving now-retired Judge Devy Patterson Russell. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:17 am
” Masha Gessen observes at The New Yorker (via How Appealing) that “the Justices wanted to talk about bathrooms. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris.] [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
Luton Borough Council v Altavon Luton Ltd & Ors (2019) EWHC 2415 (Admin) An appeal by way of case stated from a DJ’s decision at Luton Magistrates. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
" - Peter Russell"Contemporary Canadian law is profoundly shaped by the racism embedded in its foundation. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit reversed. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Russell, you have not observed anything of [Defendant] that would indicate [Defendant] lacked STATE V. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” At AP (via How Appealing), Mark Sherman reports that in G. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:55 am
Circuit Court of Appeals that the Forest Service did not have the power to authorize the 600-mile [Atlantic Coast natural gas pipeline] project to cross the Appalachian Trail. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit requested supplemental briefing on the extent to which it should give deference to the precedential interpretation of a Patent Act joinder provision that the Precedential Opinion Panel (“POP”) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) adopted in Proppant Express Investments, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
CommentThe judge noted that were he to determine the application and therefore leave it to an appeal court to make a reference to the CJEU, given the continuing uncertainty regarding Brexit it is eminently possible that the Court of Appeal would no longer be entitled to make a reference. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in this case.] [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Georgia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Citigroup Inc. 19-148Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in this case.] [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal At the Bedraggled FEC, a Clean Slate of Leaders? [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in this case.] [read post]
