Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 421 - 440 of 521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
There’s an old saying that money isn’t worth your life, and Marcell Bell should’ve heeded it. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Still, until the General Assembly specifically excludes an R.C. 2925.11 minor misdemeanor marijuana possession conviction from the purview of R.C. 2923.13(A)(3) or R.C. 2925.01(G)(1), it will remain a “drug abuse offense” and consequently a “disability” for purposes of R.C. 2923.13(A)(3).But nothing in the Stone court’s analysis actually dealt with Stone’s argument that § 2923.13 violates the Second… [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:59 am by Russ Bensing
She now wishes she hadn’t, and for the majority, that’s enough. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:00 am by Jeff Gamso
  But it should have been self-evident in 1998 when the Ohio Supremes decided that Megan's Law wasn't punitive. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:55 am
  Particularly with respect to contact that doesn't have a functional sexual purpose. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
The inference is because an offender receives a quantity of drugs, that offender is inferred to have violated the elements of R.C. 2925.03(A)(2). [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:21 pm by Jeff Gamso
  But the Parole Board says Hawkins shouldn't be killed. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  Daniel Lee Bedford probably doesn’t share my opinion about the court’s lack of output; they did find time to order the State to file a memorandum in response to Bedford’s request for discretionary appeal by today, given that Bedford’s execution is scheduled for next Tuesday. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm by cdw
 “[A]lthough the trial court referenced the jury’s recommendation that Stanley be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole, the circuit court’s order did not clearly state that it found the jury’s recommendation to be a mitigating circumstance and did not contain written findings concerning what weight the jury recommendation was given or the reasons it overrode the jury’s recommendation. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:00 am by Russ Bensing
  Parker’s lawyer could have easily figured, “well, I can’t get anything in because it wasn’t raised below,” but instead spent the time scouring the web for cases. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  (Can’t imagine why.) [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm by Shawn R. Dominy, Attorney at Law
Under Ohio Law (R.C. 4511.19[A][2]), a person with a prior O.V.I. conviction within 20 years who refuses the test is charged with a separate offense for refusing the test. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
  Manus’ case was made easier by the fact that the offenses clearly should have merged, but that’s not dispositive:  even if the offenses weren’t allied, a defendant could argue that his plea wasn’t knowing and intelligent because he wasn’t told that. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
Singleton, remanded the case for a sentencing hearing “for the limited purpose of the proper imposition of postrelease control pursuant to R.C. 2929.191. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
  It’s just that, with the departure of Rance from the scene, they won’t be stupid ones. [read post]