Search for: "S. T. " Results 421 - 440 of 742,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As a result, the previous agreement of the appellant with that earlier text was conclusively withdrawn.The fact that the ED did not agree to the last amendment of claim 1 of the main request as filed with the appellant’s letter of 23 November 2011 but held it to be inadmissible for various procedural and substantive reasons (as set out both in its communication of 25/30 November 2011 and in the addendum to the decision under appeal) could not and did not “revive” or… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:20 am by Joe Kristan
Prior Tax Update coverage: Tax Court: Roth IRA can’t own S corporation stock Cite: Taproot Administrative Services, Inc., CA-9, No. 70-70892 [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The board shares the OD’s view that the introduction of this feature into claim 1 does not contravene A 123(2). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:01 pm
"AT&T will map T-Mobile USA’s rate plans into AT&Ts billing systems as we have done in the case of prior acquisitions, so that if a T-Mobile USA consumer wishes to change her existing smartphone to a comparable smartphone from AT&Ts device portfolio, she will be able to keep her existing data plan. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:57 am
Like Ben and Eric, I felt a certain appreciation for Mukasey's odd riff about how he "kind of hope[s]" the 9/11 plotters don't get the death penalty because they're like masochists who want it, which would make the US a sadist in doling it out. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 10:04 am by Tom Smith
That’s exactly what they did with the so-called “SAFE-T Act” in Illinois. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am by Jessica Kroeze
(2) If the answer to Question 1 is yes, is an appeal against the decision to grant a patent prima facie inadmissible in this sense, which Appeal has been filed by a third party within the meaning of Article 115 EPC and which has been substantiated by arguing that there is no alternative remedy under the EPC against a decision of the Examining Division not to consider the third party’s objections concerning the alleged contravention of Article 84 EPC? [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 7:45 pm by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
Even using current technologies, Comcast has rolled out low-cost wireless service to its cable customers that rides on Verizon’s network. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Malecki Law Team
A review of the award, publicly available from FINRA’s website, discloses that the claimant also alleged that the causes of action related to an M&T Portfolio Architect Account and Rochester Fund Municipals. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm
Bursor & Fisher is confident in its ability to use AT&Ts own Arbitration Agreement to stop the merger, despite a customer agreement that keeps individual customers from suing AT&T. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
NB: Not long ago, T 830/08 found another allowable exception to R 43(6).Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:01 am by oliver randl
In decision T 293/07 [37] the board considered that the testing of humans could not be considered to represent known routine tests and accordingly the skilled person was not in a “try and see” situation. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 8:02 pm by Paralegal Mentor
You should head on over to Beverly’s blog to get the full story and learn more about T-R-E-A-T Clients Well. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, since the decision had been announced at the OPs held on 13 August 2013 and thereby became effective on that day, the appeal proceedings are terminated (T 843/91 [10]). [read post]