Search for: "SAY MEDIA GROUP LTD." Results 421 - 440 of 704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
” 18 months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Kelly
No. 337-TA-615 (ITC 337 Update) Hewlett-Packard – Initial determination terminates Mipo International Ltd. and Shenzhen Print Media Co., Ltd. from Inv. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:05 am by INFORRM
In Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 687 (QB), Eady J said: “The extent to which material is truly “in the public domain” will ultimately depend upon the particular facts before the Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am by Melina Padron
The Panel welcomes views on this issue from the media, potential witnesses, NGOs and any other groups or individuals who are interested in the Inquiry’s work. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:06 pm
This weblog is now part of the MARQUES social media family along with Class 46. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Cowles Media (1991)), this still leaves the question: Did Banks' speech breach the agreement? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
 Now they have to give their name and say why they want to receive the blog by email. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)), one is forced to question the need for clause 12 of Lord Lester’s Bill. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has now handed down judgment in Lachaux v AOL (UK), Independent Print Ltd & Evening Standard Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334, indicating that rather than a wholesale reform of the law, the serious harm threshold represents a mere revision of the principle established in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) that in order to be defamatory a statement must surpass a threshold of seriousness, being a tendency to cause… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has now handed down judgment in Lachaux v AOL (UK), Independent Print Ltd & Evening Standard Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334, indicating that rather than a wholesale reform of the law, the serious harm threshold represents a mere revision of the principle established in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) that in order to be defamatory a statement must surpass a threshold of seriousness, being a tendency to cause… [read post]