Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1"
Results 421 - 440
of 680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Guest Post: Eye witness account of India's first compulsory license appeal before the IPAB [Part II]
8 Mar 2013, 2:47 am
S. 84 (1) (b) of the Act very explicitly states that the patented invention must be made reasonably affordable to the public if a compulsory license is to be avoided. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:13 am
The issue has to do with appellate review. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:43 am
The Appellate Division affirmed Oswald “on the opinion of the Surrogate” and the Court of Appeals affirmed without decision. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:02 am
United States Department of Defense (11-cv-00890), United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge James Boasberg rejected a Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. sec. 552 et seq.] request by conservative watchdog Judicial Watchdog, Inc. to release 52 images concerning the death and burial of bin Laden on the grounds that the depictions were inflammatory and posed a national security risk, (See "TUOL" posts 4/27/12, 1/30/12.)The group made its case for reversal of the lower… [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 1:08 pm
(emphasis added) The pipe was manufactured according to the Water Board’s specifications, but the pipe contained defects due to the application of a seal coat over an outer-wrapping as required by the Water Board’s specifications. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:08 pm
Another new change in 9th Circuit practice for 2013: Electronic submission of all non-sealed Excerpts will become mandatory on March 1 for all parties registered for Appellate ECF. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Below is our listing of top developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012 in no particular order: 1. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Below is our listing of top developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for this past year in no particular order: 1. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:15 am
Mistakes are rewarded by appellate courts that gloss over whole swaths of the Bill of Rights to uphold DWI convictions. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 9:49 am
Wet Seal Retailer, it may negatively effect the outcome of both cases. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:56 am
The appellate panel’s response in State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 4:43 pm
The new standards and rules will go into effect January 1, 2013. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
" And louder still become the cries, And soon this thought foreboding flies Through every heart, with speed of light - [1] The cranes of Ibycus had told the world what the thieves had done and saw that vengeance upon the murdered poet was dealt. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 7:06 pm
Also, Appellants submit that although one lip is shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 for each panel, ... [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The present decision sheds more light on this matter.The applicants requested examination under A 94(1) EPC 1973 on June 6, 2007. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the seventh auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the second auxiliary request in that it is directed to a method of ware washing by using the array of claim 1 of the fifth auxiliary request. [2.3] As the array of all claims 1 of these auxiliary requests has been extensively modified over the array of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request, the above-mentioned description being adapted solely to the set of claims according to the second… [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:39 am
In Saldivar v Rodela, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 2914833 (W.D.Tex.) [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:24 pm
Everything in the case has been ordered sealed except the decorum order and denial of expanded media coverage order. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 am
Section 6 of the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA), which is analogous to Military Commissions Rule of Evidence 505(h), provides specific authority for federal courts to hold (1) an in-camera discussion (2) placed on the record, where the record is sealed but available for appellate review. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
A 92(1) EPC 1973 – which was applicable at the time of the search (in the case of an international application, together with A 157 EPC 1973) – requires that the European search report be drawn up “on the basis of the claims, with due regard to the description and any drawings”, and the Guidelines for examination in the EPO – both in the then applicable and in the present version – explain that “[i]n principle […] the search should cover the… [read post]
