Search for: "STANFORD V. STATE" Results 421 - 440 of 2,152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 30 January  2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:09 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Olden v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2010] EWCA Civ 143 (26 February 2010) Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Civ 158 (26 February 2010) LG, R (on the application of) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 142 (26 February 2010) Mann v Northern Electric Distribution Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 141 (26 February… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm by Anna Christensen
Below, Elisabeth Oppenheimer of Stanford Law School previews Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
Here, Vivian Wang of Stanford Law School recaps the opinion handed down Tuesday in Alabama v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 12:43 pm
Below, Stanford Law School's Sina Kian recaps yesterday's oral argument in Hertz Corporation v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:46 am
Stanford student Erica Ross wrote the following entry on one of Thursday’s decisions. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 8:29 am
Below, Stanford Law School's Brian Goldman recaps Tuesday's oral argument in Hemi Group v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am by Eric
But the inducement rule focuses on mental state, not marketplace actions—not a good focus. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:11 pm by Jason Mazzone
The article uses the twentieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 11:06 am by The Dear Rich Staff
We've posted a sample interview release at the Stanford Fair Use site that includes an optional "parental consent" provision. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
Below, Shira Liu, a student at Stanford Law School, recaps last week's oral argument in Mac's Shell Service v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:30 am by Anna Christensen
Below, Stanford Law School's Jacqueline de Armas previews Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 6:01 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
United States (the anti-commandeering principle)Clinton v. [read post]