Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2019, 3:03 pm
See also State ex rel. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Was there an independent cause of action–separate from the allegation of ultra vires governmental action–in cases like Ex Parte Young (1908), Larson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
It’s easy to do it wrong U.S. ex rel. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
Our conversations about law must shift from a paternalistic subordination of the individual to an assertion of enforceable rights as intrinsic to human dignity” (Hon’ble Supreme Court of India – Jagdish v Mohan& Others- Civil appeal no. 2217 of 2018) * * * * * * * * * * * Liability insurance has become a much talked about subject and is receiving well-deserved attention of the people both on the supply and demand side in India and also… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
Background In People ex rel. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
The FCA laws are commonly referred to as “whistleblower laws” because of the direct financial appeal to private citizens to “blow the whistle” to expose otherwise undiscovered proof of improper tax filings. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
State ex. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:50 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the eleventh circuit considered whether the police can arrest someone who failed to pay child support based on a writ of body attachment. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Court decisions from France threw me off by their short length, relative lack of factual details, and extremely brief reasons. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Supreme Court case of United States ex rel Touhy v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
State ex rel. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:49 am
People ex rel. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
The jury determined reasonable attorney's fees for both UTSW and Rohrmoos at $800,000 for representation in the trial court, $150,000 in the court of appeals, and $75,000 for representation in this Court.The trial court entered final judgment against Rohrmoos, stating:1. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm
S.D. ex rel. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm
S.D. ex rel. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:00 pm
State ex rel Emmis Broadcasting Corp., 440 N.E.2d 700 (Ind. [read post]
14 May 2019, 1:36 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
