Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF I. C. Vs." Results 421 - 440 of 637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
Since the Supreme Court’s two opinions broke no significant new ground concerning the oppression claim vis-à-vis the prior appellate ruling that I posted about previously, in this post I’m going to focus instead on the more interesting clash of the majority and concurring opinions over the plaintiff’s direct claim for breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:36 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
: How Ambiguity in Some States’ Anti-SLAPP Laws Threatens to Defang a Popular and Powerful Weapon Against Frivolous Litigation is cited in the following article: Julio Sharp-Wasserman, Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act and the Common Law of Defamation: A Convergence Thesis, 20 COLUM. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm by Law Lady
HOWARD DINNER, D.C., P.A., a/a/o DENISE CHAPMAN, Respondent. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Default on motor vehicle lease -- Summary judgment -- Trial court properly entered summary judgment where there were no issues of material fact -- Remand for correction of scrivener's errorGEORGE C. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
” The court: “Based on her admission, I’ll adjudicate her delinquent. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Such an exchange of views should be useful not only for scholars and policy makers in China and India, but also for anyone interested in other BRICS countries as well: Brazil, Russia and South Africa. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:31 pm by Venkat
(See this post from Eugene Volokh and the draft paper linked in the post for a discussion of the issues: "One-to-One Speech vs. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:43 am by The Legal Blog
(iii) Even assuming without conceding that there was an arbitration agreement between the appellant and first respondent, and that he was liable in respect of the loan amount, there could be no award for interest against him as he had not agreed to guarantee the payment of interest.Re : Contention (i)7. [read post]