Search for: "STATE v. GEAR"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2009, 3:09 pm
British Columbia, 2000 BCCA 539, 80 B.C.L.R. (3d) 212 on the rule against courts exercising jurisdiction on such matters as follows "As Cory, J. stated in R. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm
As summer kicks into high gear, and the Americans with Disabilities Act’s 30th anniversary looms large at the end of this month, businesses in many jurisdictions are in the process of gradually reopening to the public. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:34 pm
Schaumburg police calculated his speed at 111 mph using a “speed to gears” formula, which relied upon the tachometer RPM needle reading and gear found post-accident. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:24 am
Additional Resources: Hamid v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:07 pm
A lot has happened since the Department of Defense (“DOD”) released its Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) v. 1.0 back in February (see our prior discussion here). [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:26 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITLabor LawNuclear Workers' 'Donning and Doffing' of Protective Gear, Security Procedures Not Compensable Under FLSA Gorman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:55 pm
In Joyce v Ford Motor Company, No. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
The case is entitled Nelson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
Today, we discuss the brand new Supreme Court opinion of Kasten v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:49 am
Network v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 7:29 pm
United States (07-330), involving appellate judges' ability to increase sentences sua sponte, and Irizarry v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:07 am
§ 440.11] was unconstitutional [see State of Florida v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:45 am
Bell Issue: Whether a federal habeas claim is "procedurally defaulted" because it has been presented twice to the state courts, and whether a federal habeas court is powerless to recognize that a state court erred in holding that state law precludes reviewing a claim. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:54 pm
In Kasten v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
Cuomo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:57 am
Bouaphakeo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:57 am
Bouaphakeo v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 8:05 am
As I am still catching up from hiatus last month, I can only offer The Indiana Lawyer Daily report on a new lemon law case, COA rules on first impression lemon-law issueThe Indiana Court of Appeals tackled today an issue of first impression regarding the state's lemon law: Once a consumer has met the law's repair threshold, he can still file an action under the lemon law even if a subsequent repair fixes the problem.In Metro Health Professionals, Inc. v. [read post]
