Search for: "STATE v. LOWE" Results 421 - 440 of 10,586
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am by Felix Mikolasch
In line with its previous findings that damage is required for compensation, the Court states that a person affected needs to prove non-material damage (para. 50). [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff represented that it needed an account freeze to keep defendants from expatriating cash out of the country, but Respect the Look is a US company based in Connecticut, so the risk of expatriation is low. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm by Tobin Admin
Judge Hodges noted that the Georgia Supreme Court said, “the dictionary defines the word ‘agency’ as ‘a department or other administrative unit of government.'” The judge found it clear that the State, through its enabling legislation views housing authorities’ purpose in general as benefitting the low-income citizens of the State and saving money in terms of public safety and crime prevention. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
When it approved the CAT, the Commission stated that plan participants could “recoup their regulatory costs . . . through the collection of fees from their members, as long as such fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:42 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  (DEA initially placed Epidiolex in schedule V, then later decontrolled it). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
The EUIPO published The Baseline of Trade Secrets Litigation in the EU Member States in 2018. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]