Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 21,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The test is the result of 25-year-old Supreme Court ruling in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:45 am by Nancy L. Urizar, Ph.D.
On March 21, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments for the case of Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 am by Ronald Mann
Next Tuesday’s argument in Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:00 am by proliability13
These reforms were aimed at preventing frivolous lawsuits in the sale of national securities and apply to both federal and state class-actions alleging fraudulent sales conduct. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 12:50 pm by Patricia Salkin
Furthermore, nothing in the UCSA stated that a county could not prohibit retail recreational marijuana sales. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:18 am by Ingrid Wuerth
  The plaintiff argued, and the Ninth Circuit (en banc) held, that an exception to immunity applied because the action against OBB was “based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States” – namely the sale of the ticket to Sachs in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by J. Tom Minor, IV
This issue was challenged in many state courts in the 1970s and 1980s and the clauses were ultimately upheld in Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. de la Cuesta, 102 S.Ct. 3014, (1982). [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm by Amanda Traphagan
These decisions state that a state may only require retailers with a physical presence in that state to collect the state’s sales tax from customers in that state. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:39 am
The Court granted, vacated, and remanded Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:58 am by Josh Blackman
As Hawaii points out in its brief (p. 21), “in Sale v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by Adam Schlossman
   At issue in the case is whether a state law restricting the sale of violent video games to minors violates the First Amendment right to free speech. [read post]