Search for: "Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd."
Results 421 - 440
of 488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 2:26 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Sharp Corporation (“Sharpâ€) and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
 Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsungâ€), Research In Motion, Ltd. and Research In Motion Corp. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
 The order denied summary determination motions filed by Complainant Saxon Innovations, LLC (“Saxonâ€) and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsungâ€) in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Handheld Wireless Communications Devices (Inv. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Sharp Corporation (“Sharpâ€) and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:22 am
Ltd. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:35 am
Further, according to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. of South Korea and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. of Irvine, California as Respondents in this investigation. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:03 am
In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted a motion to strike the supplemental expert report of Complainant Saxon Innovations, LLC's ("Saxon") expert witness filed by Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, "Samsung"). [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 4:41 pm
On October 1, 2009, Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd of Japan and Murata Electronics North America, Inc. of Smyrna, Georgia (collectively, "Murata") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:36 pm
The investigation is based on a July 31, 2009 complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:13 pm
The Commission has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California ASUStek Computer, Inc. of Taiwan ASUS Computer International of Fremont, California Dell,… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
- Chancery Div rules in a trade secret case relating to technical information: Vestergaard Frandsen A/S and others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and others (IPKat) EWHC (Ch) finds actionable breach of confidence in case concerning stolen invoices: JN Dairies Ltd v Johal Dairies Ltd, Gurbir Singh (IPKat) Advertising Standards Authority condemns wrongful use of Volvo log by an unauthorised Volvo dealership (Class 46) Banksy – an unlikely copyright ambassador? [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
As of the end of 2008, Spansion was the third largest provider of flash memory worldwide, behind Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Toshiba. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 7:55 am
Set up in 2004 as a joint venture by the Sibre Group from Germany, Sibre Brakes (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. has grown into a heavyweight player on the local machinery manufacturing arena in five years. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:19 am
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd., 3-08-cv-00986(CAND June 24, 2009, Order) (Illston, J.) [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(BLOG@IP::JUR) New Madrid fees for applications designating the EU to become effective 12 August (Class 46) Latest European appellations registered: Polish TSG Olej rydzowy for oils; Italian PGI Abbacchio Romano for meat (Class 46) India Patents, public interest and pricing: Madras High Court decision in M C Jayasingh v Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Ramkumar patent case: New Delhi Customs favours Samsung; Customs order stayed by Madras High Court (Spicy IP)… [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:38 am
., Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:29 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 5-05-cv-02298(CAND May 14, 2009, findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law) [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated DVD (Spicy IP) (At Last... the 1709… [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(The Trademark Blog) Lutron Electronics Co. [read post]
