Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 421 - 440
of 515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
To the best of our knowledge, there is no explanation of the circumstances requiring these ordinances published on the websites of the President’s Secretariat, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Department of Telecommunications nor the Ministry of Law and Justice as on the date of the writing of this note. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
Still, police departments across the country deployed staggering levels of violence against protesters. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
During Presidency As President, Trump held onto classified documents: “Trump had a habit of grabbing intelligence documents,” said [John] Bolton, who has been a sharp critic of the former president. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:10 am
 JUSTICE DEPARTMENTS (89%); LAW COURTS & TRIBUNALS (89%);  ... ... [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
And this facial approach is rooted in longstanding precedent: In Police Department of Chicago v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Justice Department or from a special three-judge District Court in the nation’s capital. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
The justices had one such example before them at that very moment: the case of Jose Padilla. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
Faced with those rejections, the Justice Department abandoned the argument as the cases moved up on appeals to the Circuit Courts. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:08 am
The Justice Department called the case one of the largest antitrust settlements in U.S. history. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 4:15 am
Currently,executions are stalled altogether, as states await a ruling in thelandmark Supreme Court case Baze v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:36 am
In Rent-A-Center, West Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
The Obama Administration interpretation of the AUMF The Department of Justice’s March 13, 2009 habeas brief argued that “[t]he detention authority conferred by the AUMF is necessarily informed by principles of the laws of war,” citing the governing opinion in Hamdi. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
If they kill Skinner, he says,[I]t may be the biggest travesty of justice in the modern death penalty area. [read blog]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
If they kill Skinner, he says,[I]t may be the biggest travesty of justice in the modern death penalty area. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
” After FDR threatened to “pack the court” with more sympathetic Justices, a key swing Justice changed sides, saving the Court and the New Deal. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:08 pm
Department of Justice declined to get involved in the case, and when the Supreme Court passed on it two years ago, the dispute reached an end. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
The most compelling defense of the DNC lawsuit is the fact that a Special Counsel for the Justice Department is currently conducting an ongoing criminal probe into potential collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign in the 2016 election. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
” In last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more… [read post]
