Search for: "Sharpe v. Sharpe" Results 421 - 440 of 4,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Last week saw another Michaelmas decision from Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court in the form of Merck Sharpe and Dohme Limited v Shionogi & Co Limited [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat). [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
A three-judge panel for The Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas last week ruled that a trial court erred in denying a local television news station the use of the state's anti-SLAPP ("Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation") law as a defense in a defamation claim by the founder of a school for special needs students.Justice Jim Sharp wrote the 21-page opinion in KTRK Television, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:39 am
New Safety Standards for Child's Play Yards: -Side rails much not create a sharp-V edge when they're folded. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:14 am by Florian Mueller
Effectively, cellular SEPs are implemented by the baseband chip (tier 3), so if a tier 3 or tier 2 supplier is licensed, so are the tier 1 supplier (TCU maker) and, by ultimate extension, Daimler.In July, court filings in several Sharp v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Anthony Sebok
Why does Killington still ask its customers to sign the waiver struck down in that case (Dalury v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason, Damon Root previews the Supreme Court’s next big Fourth Amendment case, Kansas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:16 am
Judge Birss QC assures us that his decision in Merck Sharp Dohme Corp & Anor v Teva Pharma BV & Anor [2012] EWHC 627 (Pat), relating to an application by Bristol-Myers Squibb for an interim injunction pending trial, raises no issue of principle, but he does provide an enlightening discussion of how to address some issues of fact that are common in an application for a quia timet injunction, including a review of the European case law. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 10:28 am by Ben Sheffner
" Blogs San Francisco copyright attorney Naomi Jane Gray at Shades of Gray:In sharp contrast to the voluminous materials submitted by the parties in support of their cross-motions for summary judgment in the Viacom v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Below is a brief summary of issues before the Court last week: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:03 am by Native American Rights Fund
Gerlach (Indian Gaming; State Taxation)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlScott Ranch LLC (Tribal Water Rights Adjudication)Sharp Image Gaming INC. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:03 am by Native American Rights Fund
Gerlach (Indian Gaming; State Taxation)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlScott Ranch LLC (Tribal Water Rights Adjudication)Sharp Image Gaming INC. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 3:24 am by Jack Chin
Sharpe to the immigration context would have been remarkable. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:04 pm by Alfred Brophy
Sharp Professor of Law and History at the University of Southern California. [read post]