Search for: "Sheets v. Laws" Results 421 - 440 of 2,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by Edward A. Fallone
It is eerily reminiscent of the woeful misreading of the statutory provisions governing the publication of new laws that was argued before the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Ozanne v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
(v)    showcase innovative initiatives by faith-based and community organizations that serve and strengthen individuals, families, and communities throughout the United States;(vi)   notify the Attorney General ... of concerns raised by faith-based and community organizations about any failures of the executive branch to comply with protections of Federal law for religious liberty.... [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Partnership Law § 26(b) . . . immunizes from individual liability any partner in a partnership registered as a limited liability partnership who did not commit the underlying wrongful act, except to the extent that Partnership Law § 26(c) imposes liability on that partner where he or she directly supervised the person who committed the wrongful act” (Salazar v Sacco & Fillas, LLP, 114 AD3d 745, 747; see Ederer v Gursky, 9 NY3d 514,… [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing in a media law case is outstanding: Appleby v BBC, heard 16 January 2018 (Rose J). [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:00 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In a memorandum opinion handed down last week in the case of Bricker v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:03 am by Eric Goldman
I’m pleased to announce this year’s edition of my Internet Law casebook, Internet Law: Cases & Materials. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 1:13 am
Sheet Metal Workers' Nat'l Pension Fund, 365 F.3d 535, 537 (6th Cir.2004); Petralia v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 12:40 pm
  We jousted with pro-plaintiff law professors, both directly and indirectly, when they supported now-failed legislative attempts by the other side of the “v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Families Against Mandatory Minimums has an excellent primer on the bill, as well as a helpful FAQ sheet. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 6:44 am
Supreme court case of Caulder -v- Bull 3 U.S. 386 (1798) which states:"I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition. 1st. [read post]