Search for: "Short v. Commonwealth"
Results 421 - 440
of 562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2011, 10:34 pm
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 761 Optus was ordered to pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $5.26 million for misleading advertisements (Optus 1 was previously discussed here). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:14 pm
In 2002, in the landmark decision Atkins v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 12:34 pm
Sebelius and Liberty U. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Rev. 159-171 (2010).Percival, Robert V. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:14 pm
The short version of the holding on the issue relevant to Virginia in Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:05 pm
Read Decision: Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:17 pm
Well, perhaps it’s because Sheila is now a short-timer and will be retiring from her post at the FDIC this July, that she is now feeling a little more comfortable telling the truth, even if that means disagreeing with Walsh at the OCC or even Bernanke at the Fed. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:30 am
In Chapman v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:40 pm
Bank v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm
The major case in 1981, Cosner v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
In a very short judgment about asset freezing orders the Court of Appeal has made some tart observations about the inchoate nature of Strasbourg’s rulings. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:01 am
In March 2009, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, issued an opinion in Tristani v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:40 am
EQT Production Co.In the matter of Legard et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:03 pm
(Herring v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
The petition, seeking review of Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm
In short, under Va. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:07 am
v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm
The communication and interaction between [the child] and his mother displayed a strong and secure attachment as well as a familiarity in playful and fun activities together.Later [the mother]’s partner, [Mr V] entered the room and [the child] engaged easily in play with him and the communication appeared relaxed and familiar.In relation to his mother, the child told the family consultant he liked “walking and dancing and watching TV with mum and I have heaps of toys. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
