Search for: "Shorter v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2016, 7:54 am
The decision to repeal s.52 was prompted by the outcome of Case C-169/08 Flos v Semeraro. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:20 am
Walker In Latinos Unidos de Napa v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm
Mithun Mansinghani serves as solicitor general for the state of Oklahoma, which filed an amicus brief joined by 16 other states in support of the petitioners in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
Ferk v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
At 102 paragraphs, last week's ruling was a doddle compared with the 385 paragraphs of the original and the 211 paragraphs of the Court of Justice ruling [Merpel says, have you noticed how each judgment is shorter than its predecessor? [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:04 pm
In Larimer v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 1:42 am
DePriest v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:56 am
The First Department decided this issue yesterday in Rodriguez v Saal, 2007 NY Slip Op 06336. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Examining Diageo Brands BV v Simiramida-04 EOOD [2015] C-681/13) James drew attention to the CJEU’s strict approach to countries refusing to enforce judgments from another Member State on the grounds of public policy. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 3:13 pm
Of course, the verdicts, which were about 6% of all trade secret cases filed, are subject to the same selection effects as any other verdict analysis - there is a whole array of cases (more than 2000 of them in the federal system alone) that never made it this far, and we don't know what the tried cases tells us about the shorter-lived cases.The study offers a lot of details: amounts of awards, states with the highest awards, states with the most litigation, judge… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:56 am
A similar, though shorter, concurrence also accompanied the orders in Biden v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am
See Allied Interstate LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 9:21 am
Mexico] In Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
It stated, insofar as is relevant here,`1. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
These cases include Reed v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:45 am
In Friedhofer v. [read post]
12 Apr 2025, 11:42 pm
Regular readers will recall R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin), in which the claimants argued that the fact that legal recognition of religious wedding ceremonies under English law did not extend to weddings carried out in accordance with their humanist beliefs discriminated against them unjustifiably and breached their Convention rights under Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
