Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2019, 8:12 pm
In short, none. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:11 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:59 am
A superior court judge denied the motion, and the defendant pled guilty and appealed. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:30 pm
In a recent, non-precedential case, Guido v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
Piper of the Land Court has added his voice to the chorus of opinions on the important issue presented in the case of Eaton v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:14 am
The decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal and Ontario Superior Court of Justice set forth the facts, as do the factums in the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
” Here too, the Court of Appeals found that the Singleton indictment fell short. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:31 am
The Court noted that in Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 8:04 am
A Superior Court case from 1999 set the tone on this and said the following: This court finds controlling Canning v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 5:07 pm
Also, in a parallel case (Malandrucco v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:06 pm
The California Supreme Court’s 2018 landmark decision, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
We are also willing to bet that, while the Court's opinion may contain some language that the class arbitration ban contributed to this result, it will stop short of announcing any categorical rule against such provisions. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:51 pm
D.C. criminal defense lawyers understand that the court in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:42 am
Superior Court, 224 Cal. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 1:24 am
In the precedential case Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 am
Long story short, the class was certified by the trial court, and that decision eventually became ripe for review by the court of appeals. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 7:19 am
Currie v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 8:48 am
In that scenario, Qualcomm will have to prove in court that Apple actually does need a license to any valid and enforceable Qualcomm SEPs, and that will take time.It could be--but presuambly isn't--a coincidence that one day after the Wall Street Journal article, Qualcomm filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit against Apple in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego (this post continues below the document): 17-10-31 Qualcomm v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 10:27 am
Superior Court as it applies to the duty to “provide” a meal period in a style that is so simple that a child could understand it. [read post]
