Search for: "Sites v. Sites" Results 421 - 440 of 25,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
In the first part, Judge Hull, writing for the majority, concludes that historical cell site records are not protected because they are governed by the third-party doctrine of Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:53 am by Eric Goldman
Well, maybe I’m not that surprised people are still suing the site if it’s still around. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:19 am
Quartavious Davis, holding that all cell-site data is protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:23 am
The one you'd totally expect.Hint: One of those web sites ain't gonna be around for much longer. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:45 am
 If so, I have no intention of using the thing, since it manifestly reduces the site's credibility. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:54 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Cesar Blanco also filed a related piece of legislation, HB 353, which essentially codifies the US Supreme Court case US v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:04 am
Craner v Dorset County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1323; [2008] WLR (D) 377 “Although an action for personal injuries of a school caretaker against the employer council for leaving uneven paving slabs in the school site should be brought under reg 12(1)(2) of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, if the claimant had brought [...] [read post]