Search for: "Slaughter v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
 On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
Australia’s High Court famously left the door open for a possible privacy tort in the ABC v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:11 pm by admin
United States, a highly publicized case in which Sholom Rubashkin, the former operator of a kosher slaughter house, was sentenced to 27 years in prison in 2009 for 86 counts of financial fraud. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Gross mistake is a Texas state common law standard that has been used to attack arbitration awards. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:59 am
German epidemiologists initially thought including sprouts would only create false positives in case/control studies because sprouts, in general, are so common a food item.A CDC-FDA-state investigation of a similar outbreak here in the United States would focus more quickly on sprouts given the long history of sprout outbreaks. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:26 pm by Lawrence Liang
It might seem that all is not lost when the Supreme Court proclaims in Akhil Bharat Goseva Sangh v State of AP and Ors that the decision in Mirzapur did not mean that the slaughter of cattle by itself is unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:09 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
The Court partially reversed this position when a 7-judgebench upheld a complete ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks in Stateof Gujarat v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am by Frank Pasquale
" Li doesn't tell us whether he thinks the state should also use live fire to slaughter rebel villagers in Wukan. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Frank Pasquale
” Li doesn’t tell us whether he thinks the state should also use live fire to slaughter rebel villagers in Wukan. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:42 pm by Adam Gillette
" Also, in the Slaughter-House Cases the Supreme Court stated that involuntary servitude, can "only apply to human beings. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:21 pm by The Federalist Society
The lower court determined that the state statute did not regulate the inspection or slaughtering process itself, and therefore was not preempted by the FMIA. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit disagreed; in its view, the state law only regulates what kind of animals – those that can walk – can be slaughtered without regulating the slaughtering process itself. [read post]