Search for: "Smith v. Arizona, State of" Results 421 - 440 of 540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am by Amy Howe
  The justices also granted review on Friday in: Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Abu-Jamal Docket No. 11-49   Issue: Whether the court of appeals properly applied Smith v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
That was almost 20 years ago, but Arizona courts still follow the rule. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Wendy Rogers Refused to Speak to the Senate Ethics Panel About Her ‘Fed Boy Summer’ Tweet Arizona Mirror – Jerod MacDonald-Evoy | Published: 6/29/2022 State Sen. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Both states saw major increases in cigarette smuggling. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am by Richard Hunt
The Eighth Circuit had the same question in Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am by Marie Louise
(IP Osgoode) Patent Pilot Program (Docket Report) Design Patents (Inventive Step)   US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Marine Polymer and Section 112 rejections in reexamination: Nissim v Time Warner (WHDA) ITC issues notice of final determination finding s 337 violation in Certain Ink Cartridges With Printheads (337-TA-723) (ITC 337 Law Blog) District Court Arizona: Judge Campbell denies prosecution bar in reexamination: NeXedge v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am by Steve Vladeck
(Fifteen states, led by Arizona, filed an amicus brief in support of Texas largely endorsing this argument.) [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
” From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Voter Fraud Unit in Arizona Will [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]