Search for: "Smith v. Chief Judge" Results 421 - 440 of 1,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
If the investigators seek only the phone numbers that law clerks called, the controlling precedent would be the 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am by Francis Davey
The idea appears to have been widely accepted — for example it was argued by counsel in Cardwell v Lucas (1836) 2 Meeson and Welsby 111 150 E.R. 691 and upheld by yhe Court of Exchequer in Gandy v Jubber (1865) 5 Best and Smith 15 122 E.R. 914. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:02 am by Robert Horton
In Judge Smith's view -- joined by Chief Judge Kozinski, and circuit judges Ikuta and Murguia -- the regulations at issue do not require district ranger "authorization" prior to mining carried out pursuant to an NOI. [read post]
30 May 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  That appearance was confirmed to be reality by Saini J in Graeme Smith & ors v TalkTalk Telecom Group plc [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB). [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Metro Parks    Northern District of Ohio at AkronJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:02 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Chief Judge Cole wrote a separate opinion in this case, dissenting from the holding that dismissal was appropriate at this stage. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
Kentucky and Smith v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by Steve Davies
K-14 – Lower Seiad and Portuguese Creek Claims This time around, Fletcher got to write the opinion, from which Smith and Chief Judge Alex Kozinski dissented. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Waller    Western District of Tennessee at MemphisHABEAS CORPUSBOGGS, Chief Judge. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
After the Supreme Court’s decision two months ago in Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]