Search for: "Smith v. Field"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,027
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith in Sports Direct International plc v Rangers International Football Club plc and another [2016] EWHC 85 (Ch) to refuse to commit the respondent for contempt for alleged breach of an injunction shows the caution that the court will sometimes show when it comes to seeking to enforce injunctive relief. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 11:22 pm
The Court cited State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Smith, Supra; Doe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Smith, Supra; Doe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
With 40 individual articles spanning over 437 pages, it keeps the reader abreast of the developments in their field and other subjects by the UK Supreme Court in 86 judgments during the 2014-15 legal year. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:26 am
” I wrote a piece on that very subject last year, quoting from the IRS’s DLOM Job Aid and experts in the field. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Florida, 15-6075, and Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 11:35 am
In a recent Illinois case (People v Smith), the machine had been tested, but the certification did not state whether the machine passed. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
McGrath v Bedford. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
The Field Fisher Privacy and Information Law Blog argues that you shouldn’t rely on consent for most data transfers. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
The role of the adviser or assessor is set out in Halliburton v Smith [2006] EWCA Civ 1599. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
There are a number of interesting cases in the field of media and information law to look forward to in 2016. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:09 am
The field safety supervisor recommended that she be fired and the VP of operations terminated her on June 25. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
It is in fact the logical next step for the EU legislature to take in this field" and "a European copyright law would establish a truly unified legal framework, replacing the multitude of often opaque and sometimes conflicting national rules that presently exists. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:19 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:23 am
Pennsylvania first adopted the learned intermediary rule in 1971, in Incollingo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
For that point, the brief sites Seymour v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 10:48 am
Scoptur v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
