Search for: "Smith v. U.S. Government (Department of Justice)" Results 421 - 440 of 602
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am by Ritika Singh
The Justice Department’s Inspector General has released a report that found that employees are not properly declassifying national security information. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Mark Klamberg of Uppsala University Department of Law in Sweden writes in with the following guest post on European laws governing metadata collection and how it compares with U.S. law on the subject. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Judge Smith accepted the arguments that Texas had made in opposition to U.S. intervention, and argued that, at most, the government should be allowed into the case only as an amicus in support of the other challengers. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm by Priscilla Smith
Priscilla (Cilla) Smith is a Senior Fellow and Reproductive Justice Program Director at the Information Society Project at the Yale Law School. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:10 am by Priscilla Smith
Prior to joining the ISP, Smith was an attorney with the Center for Reproductive Rights for thirteen years, serving as the U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am by Susan Brenner
The Department of Justice relied “on a test set out by the” U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
She then continued in public service, joining the Department of Justice’s Civil Division Appellate Staff. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:01 am by Tom Webley
Chief Justice Roberts repeatedly invoked the 10th Amendment in his opinion, noting that the Act “sharply departs” from the principles governing states’ rights. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
  Introduction The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is an annual federal law that specifies the budget of the Department of Defense (DOD) and the armed forces. [read post]
17 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Wells Bennett
” Smith cited to a case a few years prior, U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am by admin
Smith, 647 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2011)), suffer from alcoholism during trial (People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm by Jennifer Granick
Additionally, the Department of Justice argues that under the current law, messages are unprotected if they are opened, read, or in the trash or drafts folder. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm by Employment Lawyers
   See Department of Justice Order 1200.1, Chapter 4-1, B.7.j, found at http://www.justice.gov/jmd/ps/chpt4-1.html (last accessed on March 30, 2012). [read post]