Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer" Results 421 - 440 of 1,269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
King County, 15-584, include petitioners familiar to readers of our last Christmas spectacular, Robert Spencer and Pam Geller (no relation to Josie “Grossie” Geller). [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
These reasons ought not to be read as endorsing the Judge’s remarks relating to “initial interest confusion” or as endorsing every alternate basis on which the Judge dismissed the action".In the UK metatags have been discussed, although not in many cases, most recently in Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc, where the High Court (after a CJEU referral) deemed the use of a competitor's trademarks as metatags would infringe their rights in those… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am by Guest Blogger
Herbert Spencer's Social Statics . . . . a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
  Other commentary comes from Phillip Pemberton at Ogletree Deakins, Shoba Wadhia and Gabriel Chin at ACSblog, and Spencer Amdur in The New Republic. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:54 am by David Fraser
Spencer decision from the Supreme Court to get access to this sort of information without judicial oversight. [read post]
More recently, the Supreme Court considered the general rules governing the implication of terms into contracts, in the case of Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor [2015] UKSC 72  (Case Comment here). [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:06 pm by Patricia Salkin
Amendola v Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of West Haven, 2015 WL 8134019 (CT App. 12/15/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:13 pm by Patricia Salkin
Spencer Taylor intervened in the appeal to the trial court, raising concerns related to the environmental impact of the proposed subdivision. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am by Warren Gordon, Olswang LLP
In Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor, the Supreme Court has given judgments that will not be welcomed by the tenant community. [read post]