Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Civil Cases"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2017, 1:37 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
And juries often fail to convict even when the evidence is strong. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:58 am
In light of this ruling, the court reversed the district court's denial of summary judgment and remanded with instructions to grant Sirius's motion for summary judgment and to dismiss the case with prejudice. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
The quoted case descriptions are from Westlaw, except where described as quotations from Gorsuch. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:32 am
This case raises a plethora of issues, including the admissibility of expert testimony, hearsay and what constitutes proper jury instructions. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
On April 3, the district court found Diamond in civil contempt and informed him that compliance with the order would remedy the civil contempt. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:33 am
Jury instructions written at a Plain English standard may be under-revised: if a specific jury has a comprehension lower than the Plain English standard, then the instructions have failed to adequately instruct the jury. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:10 am
Furthermore, the court noted that elsewhere in the instructions, the court told the jury that it must find each element “by a preponderance of the evidence,” which is the proper standard in civil cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:14 am
I believe it the only one where every man, at the call of the law, would fly to the standard of the law, and would meet invasions of the public order as his own personal concern. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 10:41 am
However, the Civil Jury Instructions Subcommittee of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Committee for Proposed Standard Jury Instructions indicated that it is permissible provided the parties and the trial judge agree. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Because unpermitted discharges can result in steep civil and criminal penalties, the meaning of WOTUS is of central importance. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
ANZ Securities, Inc. 16-373 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
The case also may (or may not) also address the issue of whether the preponderance standard applied to the burden on the non-moving party violates the Article XV jury trial right. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
The case also may (or may not) also address the issue of whether the preponderance standard applied to the burden on the non-moving party violates the Article XV jury trial right. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
The case also may (or may not) also address the issue of whether the preponderance standard applied to the burden on the non-moving party violates the Article XV jury trial right. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Glenn, supra.Next, the court outlined the “standard of review” it uses in reviewing the result in the cases that come before it:We review `for an abuse of discretion a district court's decision to bind over a defendant. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
Brann in the case of Heller's Gas v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
United States, a bank-fraud case, rejecting Lawrence Shaw’s argument that he could not be found liable under the federal bank-fraud statute if he only intended to defraud a third party, not the bank itself, and remanding for consideration of questions about the jury instructions. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
The trial court asked Juror 5 about his understanding of the court's instruction to not communicate about the case or his jury service on social media. [read post]
