Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 13,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
United Airlines, Inc. and Oman v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:48 pm
(2) Does California Labor Code § 226 apply to wage statements provided by an out-of-state employer to an employee who resides in California, receives pay in California, and pays California income tax on her wages, but who does not work principally in California or any other state? [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 12:53 pm
In Hauseur v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:04 am
United States Fire Insurance Co., Case No. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Wade and 16 states have guaranteed abortion, including states such as California, Illinois and New York that hold a significant percentage of the population. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 11:22 am
In Vidrio v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:46 am
This was the first published state court decision in California regarding employment arbitration agreements since the United States Supreme Court's groundbreaking decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Palomar Health v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Palomar Health v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
’” (South Bay United Pentacostal Church V. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
Times (Oct. 3, 2019). [20] United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 9:08 am
On June 10, 2019, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state wage and hour laws do not apply to certain drilling rig employees working off the California coast. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
The change to the FMLA policy would come after United States v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Supreme Court case of United States ex rel Touhy v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
The United States Supreme Court just heard arguments on the question of whether California's law banning the sale of excessively violent video games is constitutional. [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:02 am
In a big win for employers, the United States Supreme Court held last week that, under the Federal Arbitration Act, an arbitration agreement can prohibit an individual from commencing or participating in a class action. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:32 pm
Here’s an order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California allowing other aspects of the Martin v. [read post]
