Search for: "State of New York et al"
Results 421 - 440
of 3,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Index No. 152332/22 Appeal No. 2379 Case No. 2022-05305 [*1]In the Matter of Yonathan Bonifacio, Petitioner-Appellant, v Keechant Sewell et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Index No. 152332/22 Appeal No. 2379 Case No. 2022-05305 [*1]In the Matter of Yonathan Bonifacio, Petitioner-Appellant, v Keechant Sewell et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Carina Bowers et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
Lin and Marie Patino)New York Stock Exchange LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:47 am
MF Global Inc. et al. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:28 am
Town of Ramapo, et al. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:55 pm
City of New York, et al., No. 1:11-cv-05812, mem. order (E.D.N.Y., Mar. 31, 2015). [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:23 pm
Grasso, et al., Defendants. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
., [OPSR] et al. v Renee Campion [NYC] et al. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
., [OPSR] et al. v Renee Campion [NYC] et al. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 2:52 pm
District Court Judge Katherine Polk Failla denied Plaintiff-Investors’ attempts in Blackrock Allocation Target Shares et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
"New Jersey law governs the payment of PIP benefits for a New Jersey resident treated in New Jersey for injuries sustained in New York while a passenger in a car registered and insured in New York. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Arbitration pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement held exclusive remedy for alleged discrimination14 Penn Plaza LLC et al. v Pyett et al., United States Supreme Court No.07-581United States Supreme Court ruled that a provision in a collective-bargaining agreement that "clearly and unmistakably" compels union members to arbitrate Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) claims instead of using EEOC and courts to… [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:04 am
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, et al., The First Department held that a Gradall Forklift was a mobile crane within the meaning of the Industrial Code, 12 NYCRR 23-8.2 stating; "The court correctly held, based on the evidence adduced at the framed-issue hearing, that the subject equipment was a mobile crane for purposes of the Industrial Code regulations governing the safe operation of mobile cranes, considering the manner in which the equipment was being… [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:27 pm
In Zeltser, et. al v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Complaint)La Rosa et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
See Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm
New York (Laches - Monetary Damages);6) Jensen v, EXC., Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:29 am
Factors Influencing the Formation of Criminal Law Rules, Robinson et al., test this assumption by comparing state criminal codes from "the six largest deep blue (Democratic) states – California, Colorado, New York, Illinois, New Jersey, and Washington – and the six largest deep red (Republican) states – Texas, Florida, Ohio, Georgia, Tennessee, and Missouri – in which the same party has controlled… [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:40 am
While state and federal law is typically consistent, a difference such as discussed in Ryan et al. v. [read post]
