Search for: "State v. Arnold"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
Moreover, there have been prominent cultural property cases featuring fakes, including the Arnold Peter Weiss case, where the convicted defendant possessed forged ancient coins, and the seminal case of U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Arnold. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
A search by customs officers at an American airport, does not require reasonable suspicion, according to the Ninth Circuit in USA v Arnold. (4/21/2008). [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
Lauri Rechardt got the ball rolling by suggesting that the time and money required to make such applications would mean that this did not happen, and in the copyright context, the record industry still regards these applications as being cases they cannot afford to lose, and so its battles are picked carefully and the work is done meticulously to ensure the result.Eleonora Rosati pointed out that Cartier is the first occasion on which an application for a website-blocking order against… [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
The answer on novelty, according to Arnold J., is that the doctrine of equivalence does not apply. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:54 am
REM Staffing; Arnold v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:13 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Arnold H. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
In a decision that is only moderately Arnoldian (139 paragraphs), Mr Justice Arnold refused today to grant an interim injunction that Warner Lambert had requested against Actavis [Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) (21 January 2015)]. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
The Trunki caseThe key cases relevant to these questions were Proctor & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2007] EWCA Civ 936, in which it was held that a registered design based on a line drawing was for the shape alone, and Samsung v Apple [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, in which Apple had contended that lack of ornamentation was a feature of the simple line drawing of a tablet which they had registered as the design. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:03 am
Mr Justice Arnold cited two of his cases where this had occurred: Force India Formula One Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team Sdn Bhd [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] and Primary Group (UK) Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2014]. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 8:35 am
The style of the case is, Glen Arnold v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 8:35 am
The style of the case is, Glen Arnold v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:42 pm
For once, there are no jokes about Bird & Bird, but the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Jack Wills Ltd v House of Fraser (Stores) Ltd [2014] EWHC 110 (Ch) was handed down last Friday (31 January 2014) by Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
The complaints relate to allegations about Mr Topić’s previous job as Director General of the State Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Ohio “officially” signed on to the movement in 1993 in Arnold v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:29 am
Arnold, PC, and V. [read post]
