Search for: "State v. Atkins"
Results 421 - 440
of 670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Granted, it's only recognized in Louisiana, but there's no case out there stating flat out that Pennsylvania (or probably most other states) refuse to recognize it. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:07 pm
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Medlin v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
State, 2003 OK CR 11, 71 P.3d 30, and Salazar v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:14 pm
" (Justice Scalia, you may recall, filed a dissenting opinion in the Court's landmark decision in Atkins v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 8:30 am
Brennen: Race Conscious Affirmative Action by Tax Exempt 501(c)(3) Institutions After Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 am
This month, the story continues as the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists has officially sanctioned, or punished, psychologist George Denkowski. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court case Fisher v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Bronley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Atkins, 834 N.E.2d 1028, 1033 (Ind. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
Ten years ago, in Atkins v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:16 am
Supreme Court ruling of Atkins v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
Florida, the case in which the Court goes beyond laying down the general rule that intellectually disabled persons cannot be executed (Atkins v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Cain, 13-1433, is a capital case from the world’s prison capitol that asks “[w]hether a state court that considers evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:47 am
Many lawsuits have been asserted over the years for foul ball injuries and the issues were long ago resolved by the highest court in New York - the Court of Appeals - when it ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:52 pm
It is also worth recalling the words of Lord Atkin in Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384 at 386: It is precisely because the real damage cannot be ascertained and established that the damages are at large. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
(Senate Bill 628)The Supreme Court ruling came in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:43 pm
" Um, isn't that the result of Atkins? [read post]
