Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 421 - 440
of 701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
It is entirely clear that the reasons for invocating Article V and its requirements on member states to act is not clear. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:39 am
Austria). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am
Nevertheless, IOSCO members (like the United States) regulate 95 percent of the world’s securities markets. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:58 am
On March 14th, 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Ceská spontelna, a.s. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:02 pm
All of this is inconsistent with traditional notions of the role of law, the scope of corporate governance and the nature of corporate social responsibility int he United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
This recommendation is not legally binding on Member States. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:50 am
It has been held, however, that in the case of politicians in particular that they can be subject to more scrutiny than other individuals (Lingens v Austria 9815/82 (1986) 8 EHRR 103, [1986] ECHR 7 (8 July 1986)). [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:07 am
Among those, it was stated that the additional costs incurred directly by the provision of access to the satellite signal were zero in this case. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
Budvar opposed, citing the following alleged prior rights: (i) a figurative Bud mark effective for ‘all types of light and dark beer’, in Austria, Benelux and Italy; (ii) the appellation of origin ‘Bud’, registered under the Lisbon Agreement in respect of beer, and effective in France, Italy and Portugal; (iii) an Austrian appellation of origin ‘Bud’ protected in Austria under a bilateral convention with the former state of… [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm
Essays on the Compensation Act 2006 and Human Rights Act 1998 bring the current state of the interplay between tort, politics and legislation to the forefront. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
When this came out, Austria began investigating. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
However, if a mark was registered or applied for before the dates of accession of new Member States, then the relevant territory, and therefore relevant public, is made up only of the States that composed the EU at the relevant time (Art. 165(4)(a)). [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
Austria: A student group Europe v Facebook is to pursue a civil data protection case against Facebook, via Pogowasright. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:46 pm
In Football Dataco Ltd v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:46 pm
In Football Dataco Ltd v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
gives a keenly-awaited Opinion in Joined Cases C-274/11 and C-295/11 Spain v Council and Italy v Council. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
The rest filed observations as follows: * France & Italy: 7 cases each * UK & Portugal: 5 cases each * Czech Republic: 4 cases * Germany: 3 cases * Greece, Austria, Poland & Netherlands: 2 cases each * Sweden, Denmark, Ireland, Slovenia, Spain & Finland: 1 case each Why so few Member State observations? [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 1:45 pm
The plaintiff in Carol Sachs v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:15 pm
Its general rule, Article 4 (1), points to the law of the state in which the damage occured, i.e. either the state of the investors’ home or that of their bank accounts. [read post]
