Search for: "State v. B. T." Results 421 - 440 of 18,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2017, 4:05 am by CLAIRE DARWIN, MATRIX
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:56 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(b) provides that A statement is not hearsay if... [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:18 am by Jon L. Gelman
 Federal preemption of state medical fee schedules and regulations are a prevailing challenge to the patchwork of non-uniform state benefit programs.EagleMed, LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am by Russ Bensing
As the 8th District’s decision a couple weeks ago in State v. [read post]