Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 421 - 440 of 37,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 9:46 am by Gene Quinn
The Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit and ruled that 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) remains the only applicable patent venue statute, that 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) did not modify or amend 1400(b) or the Court's 1957 ruling in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:03 am
Westlake argued that Larson's opinions, articulated in the Ohio state litigation, are relevant to the Kentucy case and thus discoverable pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) and 45(c)(3)(B)(ii). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
A State Supreme Court determined that Cortland decision was “an error of law” and annulled it insofar as it denied White's application for Section 207-c benefits since June 13, 1996. [read post]
5 May 2007, 9:32 pm by Denese Dominguez
As opposed to the State, a criminal defendant has no right to immediately appeal a circuit court's decision not to suppress evidence and has no right to pursue a cross-appeal in a State's appeal under CJ section 12-302(c)(3). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
On November 3, 2011, a United States District Court in Louisiana denied Norddeutsche Seekabelwerke GmbH’s (“NSW”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:30 am by UKSC Blog
On Monday 27 January 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R v C. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:41 am by Krzysztof Pacula
This question lies at the heart of the request for a preliminary ruling lodged by French Cour de Cassation before the Court of Justice in the case V A and Z A, C-645/20. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:09 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Rule 4-242(c).Rule 4-243(c)(1) makes clear that a trial court is under no obligation to accept any particular sentence agreed upon by the State and a defendant. [read post]