Search for: "State v. Cameron"
Results 421 - 440
of 933
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm
Cameron Kerry, former general counsel of the US Department of Commerce, notes the robust oversight mechanisms that apply to the US intelligence community. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:42 am
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) invalidated the Safe Harbor Framework today in Schrems v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am
(d) A member state can refuse “social benefits to economically inactive Union citizens who exercise their right to freedom of movement solely in order to obtain another Member State’s social assistance although they do not have sufficient resources to claim a right of residence”: Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig C-133/13, [78]. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 11:13 pm
I’m just pointing to some legal and logistical issues that will need to be addressed if, as Cameron recently stated he will take on 20,000 Syrian refugees. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
Also see R (SG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16, at paras 105-106 [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is Sciscoe, et. al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:11 am
On Friday, he stated that Iranian policy would not change against the “arrogant” United States, in comments that Secretary of State John Kerry today deemed “disturbing. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:45 am
In the midst of the United Kingdom’s review of security and defense spending, Prime Minister David Cameron released comments urging for higher military spending to counter ISIS. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
Marzen East Carolina University and Florida State University, SSRN. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:45 am
Therefore, state provision for disabled children in hospital was not overlapping to an extent which justified the suspension of DLA after the 84th day. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 am
Cameron Mathieson, a deceased child (by his father Craig Mathieson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 26 March 2015. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
The original shot in this battle, arguing that the new patent package was setting a dangerous precedent since the EU Member States were stripping the Union of its powers, can be read here. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:02 am
Cameron Mathieson, a deceased child (by his father Craig Mathieson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 26 March 2015. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 am
Cameron Mathieson, a deceased child (by his father Craig Mathieson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 26 March 2015. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Paul alerted us to the Supreme Court’s pending decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:30 am
In the June 8, 2015 ruling in Hill v. [read post]
