Search for: "State v. Chief"
Results 421 - 440
of 21,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Stewart argued Vidal v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:05 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined Justice Ginsburg’s opinion. [read post]
19 Feb 2004, 4:01 pm
On February 20, 1809, US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall ruled in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:17 pm
The post India Supreme Court refers plea for quashing scam case against former state chief minister to larger bench appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
(David Kopel) In NFIB v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
Curious about what state judges make? [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:04 pm
Eleven months after ruling that taxing damage awards for nonphysical compensatory damages violated the United States Constitution, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has reversed itself in Murphy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:03 pm
In my mind, to state the question presented by this case is pretty much to answer it. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 10:25 am
Monitor, Ethan DeWitt has a front page article headlined “At state Supreme Court nomination hearing, MacDonald grilled over Roe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 9:37 pm
Supreme Court's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 12:28 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:09 am
Chief Justice Taney’s 1857 opinion in Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:09 am
Chief Justice Taney’s 1857 opinion in Dred Scott v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Madison and Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
Ball State University ___ U. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:47 am
Gore (2000), and Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
