Search for: "State v. Community Distributors" Results 421 - 440 of 565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
Information not privileged (b) Information that is communicated to a physician in an effort to obtain a controlled dangerous substance in violation of this section is not a privileged communication. [read post]
District Court for the Central District of California has dismissed the antitrust claims in Rock River Communications Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
But not everyone saw the effects of this new technology as benign: some saw the prophesied erosion of state power as an invitation to anarchy, or as opening the door to the very evils that the state power was being deployed to prevent. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm by Michael Froomkin
There is a line of cases starting with Talley v California, then McIntyre v Ohio Elections Comm’n, and running through the more recent Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, in which the Supreme Court sets out a sweeping constitutional right to anonymous religious and political speech. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:06 am by Scott A. McKeown
Rubber also alleged that Ecore threatened litigation to competitors, distributors, architects, and end-users, and communicated to them that they may not sell or purchase rubber acoustic underlayment from anyone else due to the ‘723 Patent. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:02 pm
Defendants thus appeared to be nothing more than sellers of fungible goods in a complex series of transactions that were directed by foreign gangs.The decision is European Community v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:24 am
Every few weeks there seems to be another giant-sized decision in the Battle of the Buds -- and here's the next installment: Case C 96/09 P Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Bud? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
 There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]