Search for: "State v. Concepcion" Results 421 - 440 of 1,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Jay Eng
Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011), maintained that “state law bearing on contracts of adhesion remains good law. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 We have a wealth of varying viewpoints on AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:44 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
   In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 6:08 am by Epstein Becker Green
   In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 1:28 pm by John Lewis and Dustin Dow
Horton opinion and for overstating the effect of Concepcion where a state law hostile to arbitration is not present. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:19 am
 So, the California Supreme Court just issued the following order:In light of the United States Supreme Court's order vacating our judgment in the above-entitled case and remanding the cause to this court "for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Beth Graham
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Beth Graham
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 am by John Lewis and Dustin Dow
After all, coming from an influential jurisdiction like California, Iskanian’s analysis of Concepcion in the context of PAGA claims created a wide exception that other states may choose to follow. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:31 am
Concepcion, the Court held that the California law was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:25 am by Jeffrey
Next week could initiate the foreclosure of the class-action system as we know it, because that's when the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will hear arguments in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]