Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 421 - 440 of 4,047
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
It appears that the New York Court of Appeals live streams oral arguments, so tomorrow, for the second day in a row, we'll go live with real-time blogging of an important and fascinating case (today we're blogging oral arguments in the Hawaii Supreme Court on a land use case). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
The same sort of division was very much in evidence in Kisor v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
  The final sentences of the decision referred to Gilead's patent for the combination having been revoked by the Opposition Division and their appeal dismissed. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Rick Garnett
A short version, though, is that, a little more than 50 years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The O'Grady decision by the Appellate Division, the full text of which is set out below, illustrates one such type of administrative disciplinary procedure and the individual's appeal from a determination made after hearing by the appointing authority conducted pursuant to Social Services Law §494 and 14 NYCRR 700.6[a]:Matter of O'Grady v Kiyonaga 2019 NY Slip Op 04170 Decided on May 29, 2019 Appellate Division, Second… [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  In 2018, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Two) reversed the trial court's order denying Sony's anti-SLAPP motion, holding that the attribution of the songs to Michael Jackson "did not simply promote sale of the album, but also stated a position on a disputed issue of public interest. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:47 pm
Yesterday, the New York Court of Appeals-- the state's highest court-- issued two decisions in the long-running, high-stakes dispute between two factions of New York's Orthodox-Jewish Satmar Hasidic community. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:39 am
”  Judge Crone concurred in result stating that the “premiums are more akin to future income, and I think that they would be more appropriately treated by the trial court in the same manner as future earnings ability,” which is not subject to division.In Brown-Day v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:10 pm by Evan M. Levow
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently heard an appeal filed by a prosecutor’s office in a criminal DWLS case, State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:10 pm by Evan M. Levow
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently heard an appeal filed by a prosecutor’s office in a criminal DWLS case, State v. [read post]