Search for: "State v. Crawford" Results 421 - 440 of 1,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Although Crawford v Washington held that admission of testimonial evidence from a presently unavailable witness whom the accused had no prior opportunity to cross-examine violates the accused's Sixth Amendment right of confrontation, New York's statutory embodiment of the business record hearsay exception survived the decision in Crawford. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
  The state’s Supreme Judicial Court reexamined the issue in 2005 (Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:43 am by Kent Scheidegger
Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 75 (1980) (overruled on other grounds in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 12:15 pm
United States (intent element in criminal tax evasion case) Wednesday January 9: Crawford v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:06 am
After all, the plight of people who could be negatively affected by the recent Supreme Court case upholding Indiana's voter ID law (Crawford v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Texas that business records are not testimonial under Crawford. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990):IN LIGHT OF CRAWFORD v. [read post]