Search for: "State v. Doyle"
Results 421 - 440
of 481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 12:14 pm
As the Court stated in Butz v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:17 am
Justice Dufficy’s legal analysis beginning at page 6 of his decision includes an excellent review of the statutory standard and interpretative case law governing dissolution of LLCs, citing familiar cases such as 1545 Ocean Avenue, Doyle v Icon, and (pardon the self-promotion) a couple of cases I litigated and won (Natanel v Cohen and Sieni v Jamsfab, LLC). [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
In other Court action, forty-eight states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in Snyder v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:51 am
D.P.P. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
He served as Missouri state director for Sen. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:27 am
Under LLC Law § 702’s standard for dissolution as pronounced by the Second Department in the 1545 Ocean Avenue case, and under First Department case law (Doyle v Icon and more recently, Barone v Sowers) holding that a non-controlling member’s exclusion from management by itself does not constitute a valid claim for LLC dissolution, it’s difficult to see how the sparse allegations in the Koch petition could survive a motion to dismiss. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 4:48 am
Judge Jim Doyle later became our partner as well. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am
In Tradesman Program Managers, LLC v Doyle, decided earlier this month by the Appellate Division, First Department, the court affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley rejecting the tax estoppel argument made by the putative holder (JCB) of an 18.75% membership interest in an LLC. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am
” She also found that petitioners’ additional allegations of “oppressive conduct,” even if assumed true, did not constitute ground for dissolution under § 702 as construed in Doyle v Icon and other cases. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Supreme Court‘s recent decision in Pritchard v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am
They also argued that the complaint’s allegations of oppressive conduct by the siblings, while relevant under the statute governing judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, have no application under § 702 as per cases such as Doyle v Icon and Matter of Kassab. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:07 am
However, it is notable that in Patterson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:07 am
However, it is notable that in Patterson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:41 am
The Crown Court at Manchester: guidance In relation to offences dealt with in the Crown Court, more specific guidance may now be taken from the remarks of the Recorder of Manchester (His Honour Judge Gilbart QC) in R v Carter, Beswick, Boyd, Gillespie-Doyle - 16th August 2011. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:18 pm
This president is set forth in Bard v Jahnke, 2006. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:00 pm
Doyle, Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:46 pm
“What are exorbitant fees? [read post]
