Search for: "State v. E. C." Results 421 - 440 of 9,372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As one commenter stated: “In the hours and days following a cybersecurity breach, companies must quickly and efficiently contain, minimize, and remedy any damage or loss resultin [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In a Memorandum for the Governor in relation to the bill, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel of the State Education Department, Ernest E. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In a Memorandum for the Governor in relation to the bill, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel of the State Education Department, Ernest E. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm by Marketing
Decisions from the Federal Circuit Court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Inj. and Workers’ Comp. 2d §§ 4.05[2][a]-[c], 27.01[1][c]; Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law, Ch. 10, § 10.01[4].] ■ Angela Dawson, Applicant v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Harriet Gray, Lexology: Balancing beliefs in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:15 am by Jennifer Davis
” He also cited the earlier Court ruling in a similar case, Fletcher v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am by Katherine Gallo
 §2023.030(a), the court has the power to impose four “drastic sanctions” pursuant CCP §§2023.030(b), (c), (d), and (e): The least severe of these sanctions is the “evidence” sanction. [read post]